Reblogged from The New Inquiry:
... The trailer opens with a cherubic boy singing the Star-Spangled Banner at a football game before calm inevitably gives way to storm: a gas-masked sadist blows up the field, prisoners riot, swat teams assemble, a tank fires on city hall, a hover craft flies through the streets, and so on. These rapid-fire cuts act as bundled spectacles of stimulation: Look at all this action you are going to enjoy! Hence our attention lingers when the clip slows down. There are three such moments: butler Alfred comforts a forlorn Bruce Wayne by invoking Bruce’s orphan-related trauma, the boy sings the American anthem, and then — the longest by far — an extended ballroom scene where a spectral Anne Hathaway whispers in Bruce Wayne’s ear:
You think this can last. There is a storm coming, Mr. Wayne. You and your friends better batten down the hatches, because when it hits, you’re all going to wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us
Class tension here is not only directly addressed but presented as the central threat to which Batman must respond. The next shots are of rioting prisoners and others chanting a phrase in a foreign language. What are they saying? “Rise,” we are told. Rise? Is this a working-class revolution we are being promised?
When Hathaway’s character invokes inequality, the camera pulls in tight on Wayne’s face, allowing us a good look. His expression is confused, anguished — not the pique or fatigue you’d expect yet another villain to provoke. Instead, his face seems to entertain the possibility that she is already right: not about the coming storm but about how Bruce/Batman could have so much and have lived so well with this fact without making that face until now. Shouldn’t he have seen the structural violence already, from both of his positions?
At that moment, Bruce Wayne’s face reveals the unspeakable contradiction that he can’t escape, either as Bruce or as Batman: “What am I doing with all of this dough, and what is Batman protecting?”
The justification for Wayne’s wealth has always been that it afforded him resources to “fight crime” as a semi-reclusive philanthropist and as Batman. But as the first film in the Nolan reboot, Batman Begins, emphasizes, degenerate street criminals and not super-villains motivate Batman by murdering Bruce’s parents, whose beneficent philanthropy had been all that was keeping Gotham City’s ungrateful poor from destitution. A war on street criminals can be read uncomplicatedly as a war on the poor. When Batman’s interventions are understood alongside his double’s conglomerate — Wayne Enterprises, which designs, for instance, the U.S. military’s equipment of deathmaking — a new problematic crystallizes. By rooting for Batman, we are endorsing the seamless violence of monopoly capitalism (represented by Bruce Wayne), reinforced by blunt coercion (represented by Batman). ...
You think this can last. There is a storm coming, Mr. Wayne. You and your friends better batten down the hatches, because when it hits, you’re all going to wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us 
fascinating analysis of the trailer. for the second film of the trilogy, the DARK KNIGHT, nolan spliced in shards of class struggle within the workings of the crime syndicate and the formless destructive powers of the joker.
still, i have a feeling that most who watch this latest movie will not see it but for the summer blockbuster it is.
i have my doubts about these films anyway as films. i'm seeing it on saturday.
at any rate, nolan's visions do seem to be images of our time of late-capitalism. that things are winding down and entropy is gaining on us.
Posted by: richard lopez | 19.07.2012 at 11:09 PM
Let me know what you think, Richard. Of the movie, I mean, and whether the trailer, in order to draw people in, has distorted the film as a whole - or whether it's actually the haiku version of the whole thing.
As for "nolan spliced in shards of class struggle within the workings of the crime syndicate and the formless destructive powers of the joker" do you think that there's any chance once could see the crime syndicate as a paranoiacally distorted version of a competing capitalist enterprise such as the cartels, etc? And that Batman, in crushing it, is still acting in the interest of Wayne Enterprises and other members of the ruling neoliberal power bloc?
Posted by: john | 20.07.2012 at 07:59 AM
i saw the joker as mr hyde to the cartels' dr jeckyl. desire achieves formlessness and therefor the center would not hold. the joker was anti-capitalist in the most formal sense. he cared not for the structure of the markests. nor did he think of himself as being against structure itself. he was violent negation. a black hole.
but there is a scene in the end where you can see that the joker was energized to the point of mania when he thought the batman would do violence, the kind of violence of which he practiced. at that moment they are equals.
i thought of the cartels not as a distortion of wayne enterprises but an extenstion of wayne enterprises. they are
still in the end businessmen. like the who said, 'meet the new boss/same as the old boss'.
i do have to commend nolan for broaching such subjects within a comic-book film.
such bravery is one of the reasons why i champion A CHILDREN OF MEN. perhaps some fo the imagery is dated in that film but the filmmaker, cuaron, populates his visions of a dystopian future with knowledge of our present day.
Posted by: richard lopez | 21.07.2012 at 12:34 AM
Thanks, Richard. So: the Joker as "capitalism's other." Perhaps his violent negation is a "return of the repressed", meaning he's what the so-called invisible hand actually does, not bring order, which is what the capitalists would like it to do but wreak a kind of mindless havoc. From what you say he's not capitalism, he's maybe "the market" - completely amoral. But, hell, it's a comix movie, not a directly and anti-capitalist text. I don't want to overread too much.
Posted by: john | 21.07.2012 at 08:45 AM
that is the danger of contextualizing anything, john, by reading too much into stuff. but our abilities to find form and structure is what makes our human minds absolutely marvelous. and dangerous.
the joker as the market which is completely amoral, yes, but i would say that the joker is 'anti-anti' so it would be hard for a full defination of his mind and actions without contradictory data. recall that the scene where he takes over the cartels, then steals their money, only to burn that money as it was piled in a large warehouse with the cartels' money sitting bound and gagged on top of that burning pile. the joker's actions were contradictory and utterly without meaning.
it is clear that christopher nolan does indeed mean to put our current socio-economic turmoils within his batman films. there is a danger to overread the work, i i guess, as in the latest movie it is difficult to pin meaning to the filmmaker. is nolan for the occuppiers or is he tackling the difficulties of the 1percent with sympathy?
it was difficult to tell while watching the movie. there are a couple of scenes that mirror the horrors of the reign of terror of the french revolution complete with revulsion directed at the revolutionaries hell-bent on committing evil. but then there are several scenes where wall street get its comeuppance with verve bordering on delight.
Posted by: richard lopez | 22.07.2012 at 05:25 PM
Per ongeluk sien jou artikel, ek voel baie soortgelyk aan die skryfstyl en ek kan sien die inhoud van die artikel en sy eendersdenkende, dit is regtig die moeite werd is gelukkig om jou artikel te lees soos wat Concert generallyalso hoop dat jy meer goeie werke sal en spesiale woord van dank.
Posted by: converse pas cher | 25.07.2012 at 01:43 AM
Obama is not a Socialist! Obama is a pragmatist and he is deniiftely not a Communist.When you have a communist society you are living under different conditions than you are under capitalism. The future where communism will reside will have a highly developed labor saving technology that will allow the production of enough goods and services that will satisfy the society’s material needs with a very small amount of effort. The labor saving technology will free up the time of unneeded workers to involve themselves in producing for themselves and for society’s enjoyment,… art, music, poetry, literature,etc. Arduous labor will be a thing of the past, The political apparatus will no longer be needed and will disappear. Social scientific individuals aware of people around them will voluntarily do for their community what is right and what is social. You will have an administration of things. Not an administration of people.The Right Wing Crazies are so ignorant they would not know a communist or a socialist if one sat on their face!
Posted by: Lydiane | 08.08.2012 at 11:57 PM
I would like to apI feel great to write this article, which share a lot of things, I learned a lot of knowledge from which to learn more things.
Posted by: cardiacdietmenu.com | 30.08.2012 at 05:51 AM
uiarsjzdavsd I process becoming successful in perusing inside regards to even a sense come with feelings and habit you carry on in front of post -Nike Nfl Jerseys So suitable here is hoping they can be obtaining records for the inevitable sequel. Nike Nfl Jerseys zecsdoxukk
Posted by: Nike Nfl Jerseys | 12.09.2012 at 12:22 PM
baoroxxljaz, omg, i concur of Devon -cheap air max cheers for asking! cheap air max aieyhbqx
Posted by: cheap air max | 12.09.2012 at 05:52 PM
The Dark Knight is one of the best movies that has ever come out of Hollywood. The childhood figure of Batman has been adapted perfectly for movie theatres, and the stories in the series make you look forward to what happens next. No wonder the film has had major success in box offices and has generates millions in revenue. Personally, I found nothing negative to say about the movies and I have watched all of them in cinema theatres. I consider them to be a much bigger success than Spiderman.
Posted by: Jason@Tickets | 12.10.2012 at 02:52 PM
The Dark Knight is one of the best movies that has ever come out of Hollywood. The childhood figure of Batman has been adapted perfectly for movie theatres, and the stories in the series make you look forward to what happens next. No wonder the film has had major success in box offices and has generates millions in revenue. Personally, I found nothing negative to say about the movies and I have watched all of them in cinema theatres. I consider them to be a much bigger success than Spiderman.
Posted by: buy admission essay | 22.10.2012 at 04:58 AM
Fantastic one. Really informative for the topic of discussion. Have learn much more from that.
Posted by: press release distribution services | 18.11.2012 at 08:07 AM
Excellent post. Really love to read your blog. Thanks to share creative knowledge to us.
Posted by: Medical Practice management | 26.11.2012 at 08:02 AM
I feel strongly about it and really like reading additional on this subject.
Posted by: furla outlet | 07.05.2013 at 02:35 PM
I bookmarked it to my bookmark webpage list and might be checking back soon.
Posted by: jordan shoes for cheap | 08.05.2013 at 06:27 PM