In the House of the Hangman 855

I can spell anesthesiologist but not marvelously and “… think that sugar is more important than simile.” I said like, in general, I hold out for some sorts of cultural specificity. Like maybe. He was asking me what I thought about specific issues like genital mutilation, especially female, I suppose. ‘Tis ack. & your car was wooden by enclosing it, a house chewing on a family. When you throw something, it goes right in the air. I have myself to thank you. Don’t even go there. Quite literally I stand in the littoral zone: a lens -- no an aqueous humor, my feet on the land below the high-water mark, my hand a glazed waver: hello light-purple lights, hello red spots, you've beaten the stars out tonight but you're struggling with the atmosphere. T or F: The past is damned to necessity. All your networks are all your contexts. Love must win. The panopticon was a nineteenth-century installation / performance art project. Allemann, page one, sentence one: I fuck babies. Allemann, last page, last sentence: Say nothing. Open Wide. And if you think the CString is bad, wait until you meet JeanPants Underwear! They see a scarab beetle scurry along the floor with a big robe, for this crossing, the eye is alert and intrigued. ‘He left behind many brilliant insights on his road to unsuccess. His failure was of a singular and spectacular kind.’ That bird that rubs its beak on the mountain (sometimes it's Fuji, sometimes Everest) only once a year, like a birthday … Codex Seraphinianus? I was in Milan say 10 yrs ago, saw a stack of about 50 copies, but it was part of an art show, and I didn’t know who to ask if they were for sale. In the same letter Porter quoted from memory a line of Wittgenstein that he felt central to his own view of aesthetics: “It’s hard to even fathom an imaginary creature as good this — presenting the world’s best animal, chameleons that lay golden eggs and can stand on a match tip. That is to say, every sentence is in order as it is.” Our morning hymn this is, and song at evening in feature full of folk saying scumbags! reptiles! the old folks just better stay at home or lose their reason too, mine and yours loaned against non-interest, souls implanted by necessity smooth turning upon an axle you’d not know was not granted its near life to be there, on-site in foam. We're looking for new things to paint from old issues of WEIRD MYSTERIES. The naked Maja must be washed with d’intelligent sponges, while Marjorie Perloff juggles flaming apples, GOOD LORD, DID I GET HYDROFLUORIC ACID ON MY SKIN! 1913 was also the year of the Trafalgar Square suffragette riot. Infinite Axiom: There is an other inside of me to whom I address this speech. He is on your side. Imagine me as a womb. Imagine my words as the uterine wall, as the sound of someone great and lovely breathing, the sounds of someone’s blood pumping, the sounds of some father lending his ear to my outer wall and listening closely. Imagine that you are a child. Imagine that you are a child inside of me. But do not imagine me as me. I am your child. That is, as Whitehead observes, the plane of immanence defended by flat ontology is a disjunctive diversity of multiplicities or what onticology calls objects or systems. In formal logic, an inclusive disjunction (P v Q) is true so long as one or both of the atomic propositions (P, Q) that compose it are true. Consequently, if P and& Q both exist then the disjunction P v Q will be true. Likewise if P exists and Q does not exist the disjunction P v Q will be true, and if P does not exist and Q does exist, the disjunction P v Q will be true. The only instance where P v Q will be false is where there P and Q both do not exist. Dragons are like opium smoke. But what about water dragons? Big waves, climbing up and up over a reef – “a confusion in which no straight line can be traced or drawn between creator and created – the ‘Dustism’ of original inauthenticity” – “Black Infinity” – “The Untimely (and Unshapely) Decomposition of Onto-Epistemological Solidity” – “What is a Hermeneutic Light?”

[Note: Sources: Sandra Doller, and Kamau Brathwaite, as quoted in Doller’s “LIKE SUGAR LIKE”, at Omnidawn, 1 May 010, and “We Hunter the Excuser”, as quoted in Adam Robinson, “Sandra Doller, EXPLAIN YOURSELF!”, at HTMLGIANT, 18 Nov 09; Ben Doller, “big deference betwixt throwing things and throwing things away”, “Chickenstrips”, at La Petite Zine, and “Sattelite Convulsions”, at Poets.org; JBR; Christopher Vitale, “A Philosophical Love Poem: In Memoriam, Netta Scimecca 1924-2012”, at networkologies, 23 Feb 012; JBR, but see Hrag Vartanian, “Not Everything Is Performance Art People”, at Hyperallergic, 23 Feb 012, and Stuart Elden, “New Perspectives on Bentham’s Panopticon”, at Progressive Geographies, 23 Feb 012; Urs Allemann, Babyfucker, and Lily Hoang, as quoted in Hoang’s “Babyfucker Blog Project: Lily Hoang”, at Give a Fig, 23 Feb 012 (deleted post); Kevin Farrell, “Why, CString, Whyyyy?”, at Unicorn Booty, 16 Apr 011; Henri Michaux, “Animals Fantastique” (tr. Paige Taggart), at Sink 9; Louis Menand, The Metaphysical Club, as quoted in Maryam Monalisa Gharavi, “Semiotic Dubai: Peirce and Pop Architecture”, at The New Inquiry, 23 Feb 012; William Keckler, “that bird”, at Joe Brainard’s Pyjamas, 23 Feb 012; JBR, but see Feng Sun Chen, “CODEX SERAPHINIANUS: INFINITE INSPIRATION”, at *, 23 Feb 012; William Keckler, “Fairfield Porter”, at Joe Brainard’s Pyjamss (The Sequel), 23 Feb 012; Disinformation, 23 Feb 012; J H Prynne, Kazoo Dreamboats, or, on what there is, as quoted in John Armstrong, “Reading ‘Difficult’ Poetry with Success. Prynne, Hill and David Jones”, at Bebrowed’s Blog, 23 Feb 012; phaneronoemikon: “Chandu, the Brigolure…”, at Jellybean Weirdo With Electric Snake Fang, 23 Feb 012; JBR, thinking of the Doller’s journal (there’s a YouTube Video in which Sylvia Pankhurst makes an appearance at 53 seconds); fragile keys, “Negligible Differences”, at Fragile Keys, 22 Feb 012; JBR; Levi R Bryant, “A-theology”, at Larval Subjects, 23 Feb 012; Timothy Morton, “Happy Losar”, at Ecology without Nature, 22 Feb 012; JBR;Reza Negarestani, Alisa Andrasek, Eugene Thacker, Ben Woodard, Alexander R Galloway, as quoted in Nicola Masciandaro, “Leper Creativity: Cyclonopedia Symposium”, at The Whim, 22 Feb 012]

Comments

[lunettes police]

Because one doesn‘h thank you the way you desire them to assist you to,doesn‘d necessarily mean you get into‘longer accept you boost they want. [url=http://ruepas.com/]lunettes police[/url] lunettes police

[tee shirt wiz khalifa]

Precisely where there's always a bonded relationship with no adoration, we will have romance with no romantic relationship. tee shirt wiz khalifa http://ruetaille.com/ tee shirt wiz khalifa