Facebook is just pixel puff off a virtual dog, and off these giant oil ;engines and their umbilical cords: this cord, that cord: that cord dangles with a puddle on the end. Migratory birds know where to go, something outside them tells them. But adjectives have a hard time, everything’s too fast, don’t bet on language, it’s in charge of bodies in area 51. The quantity theory: there will be always the exact same amount of vomit god. And yet, and yet, I climb three flights of stairs to get to San Francisco after having climbed three flights of stairs and after having climbed three flights of stairs and three flights of stairs to get to San Francisco I’m having somewhat yummy fun. Click. An oldish woman stands amid the dunes holding one end of a leash at the other of which is a big old ugly nasty-ass dog. A naked man down on his knees implores or prays or something. He’s on his knees. Does he see them? The sky is blue. She has a flower pattern printed on her skirt. You can see about 4 inches of the crack of his ass. Grass and weeds then desert are our planet’s critical response. I do pray for polar bears to keep on keepin on though. I didn’t totally fail Eskimo class. And I don't think we're getting anywhere near “what” but you refuse to use the G.P.S. For what it’s worth, when I was born I was the 75,726,646,121st person since history began. Now time has passed my electrodes are fucked and random voltage is shooting thru the middle of my chest. The movie opens with a robbery in progress. One of the robbers emerges from a grate, only to vanish, leaving behind shirt and shoes and pants and socks like in The Invisible Man. At the same time, sailors report attacks by Liquefied Flesh-Eaters when they board an abandoned ship. The LFEs are victims of a bomb test radiated into H-Men. Their “ghost ship” docks in Tokyo’s harbor and ooo-eee-ooo the H-Men escape into the city's sewer system. Soon people began to disappear due to a goo that surrounds and liquefies them while police and scientists race against time to I’m sure you get the rest. The climax bears some similarities to the finale of Them! which took place in the LA sewers where the army battled giant, mutant ants. Still, you can’t pass through Ghent & not pay your 4 Euros for yet another visit to “The Adoration of the Mystic Lamb.” I get these dog ear flaps on either side of my head [deleted text] name the criteria once frequenting the index. So one day she said there’s something I think I should tell you; I have no left hand. In Antwerp this afternoon at the Museum of Anaesthesia. What else? I’ll tell you. Noticing that she does, that he does and so on. Cette histoire se passe, po man with bandaged skull, self-portrait on cover of my Lebanese comic book, This leaves us with what. Arcadia. But what exactly is Arcadia, anyway? In the Greek mythos, it’s where Paris stands when he judges who has the greatest beauty: Hera, Athena, or Aphrodite. This is significant: he’s choosing between representatives of Olympus (power), Parnassus (knowledge) and Aphrodite (production), and he makes the choice from the only position outside their realms: Arcadia, the potential world, the might-yet-be. Art appears this time in the shape of a monkey on a seven-foot rope bed, using her aphasia and slurred speech to enunciate a list of words she can’t quite get to. Thus discomfort. Which is one reason Aufklarung’s not a synonym for Cartesian rationality, nor even necessarily a particular period in history, but something like a virtual tendency within human social collectives that exists, to use Badiou’s language in Logics of Worlds, with greater or lesser intensity or brightness at all times and places. What, then, is the nature of this tendency and intensity? For me– and others will differ –Enlightenment is a synonym for immanence. Or, as Tim says, “I’ve always had a soft spot for Leibniz. It's those fish ponds within fish ponds.” For me, it’s always been the clouds of bugs. I propose that we invent–that we provoke – that we do whatever it takes to make contact. I propose that we refuse binary consciousness – and in its place establish things more adaptable and changeable –sacrosanct habitats – fields of seeping, sumptuous fractals – vibratory infrared blotches as they are smearing. I think of these notes as wings: as the wet parts that will re-combine or fold: to make: a living structure. It is okay to feel this weak, this listless. And there to lie down, next to the ivy. Crystalline. Throbbing like a heart beneath a sheet. I told you there were problems w/my electrics. Of paper. White paper. Suddenly real. The frost on each green leaf. A dark or glossy leaf with creamy and rigid veins. There’s a name for the pyramid of three asterisks: asterism. By my green candle. My heart is still. Some lavender oil and an amber ring. Let’s not overmine or undermine. Dreams have attracted the curiosity of humankind for millennia. In A Dream Interpreted Within a Dream, Elliot Wolfson guides the reader through contemporary philosophical and scientific models to the archaic wisdom that the dream state and waking reality are on an equal phenomenal footing -- that the phenomenal world is the dream from which one must awaken by waking to the dream that one is merely dreaming that one is awake. By interpreting the dream within the dream, one ascertains the wakeful character of the dream and the dreamful character of wakefulness. Assuming that the manner in which the act of dreaming is interpreted may illuminate the way the interpreter comprehends human nature more generally, Wolfson draws on psychoanalysis, phenomenology, and neuroscience to elucidate the phenomenon of dreaming in a vast array of biblical, rabbinic, philosophical, and kabbalistic texts. To understand the dream, Wolfson writes, it is necessary to embrace the paradox of the fictional truth -- a truth whose authenticity can be gauged only from the standpoint of its artificiality. The dream, on this score, may be considered the semblance of the simulacrum, wherein truth is not opposed to deception because the appearance of truthfulness cannot be determined independently of the truthfulness of appearance.
[Note: Sources: Andrei Codrescu, “Facebook Redux”, “The Gulf of Mexico (Social Realism)”, as quoted in Jerome Rothenberg, “Andrei Codrescu: Two New Poems, ‘Facebook Redux’, ‘The Gulf of Mexico (Social Realism)’, at Poems and Poetics, 29 Oct 011; Will Self, The Quantity Theory of Insanity (memory quote); Issa (memory quote); JBR; JBR, (ekphrasis practiced on a picture by John Dermot Woods, “A Picture for Mullany”, at Montevidayo, 29 Oct 011); William Keckler, “Dear Suicide,”, at Joe Brainard’s Pyjamas (The Sequel), 28 Oct 011; JBR; BBC News, “The world at seven billion”, at BBC News, 26 Oct 011; JBR (I’m writing this in the middle of my 3rd afib attack in the last 4 days – obviously time to change my meds); lost where I saw the post about H-Men, but it appears to have been lifted from Turner Classic Movies; Graham Harman, “Belgium wrap-up”, at Object-Oriented Philosophy, 29 Oct 011; Timothy Morton, “haircut”, at Ecology without Nature, 29 Oct 011; JBR: Marjorie Welish, Word Group, Cole Swensen, Try, Mark Bibbins, The Dance of No Hard Feelings, Randall Mann, Breakfast with Thom Gunn, Martha Ronk, In a Landscape of Having to Repeat, as quoted in John Gallaher, “Ten-Second Books”, at Nothing to Say & Saying It, 29 Oct 011; JBR, re drawing on the cover of Mazen Kerbaj, Cette histoire se passe, embedded in email from Mazen rec’d 29 Oct 011, approx. 3:48 PM PST 9 (Cette histoire se passe = this story takes place); Robert Archambeau, “Occupy Arcadia: Mythos of an Emerging Movement”, at Samizdat Blog, 28 Oct 011; Paul Celan, The Meridian (eds. Bernhard Böschenstein and Heino Schumll; tr. Pierre Joris); Ming poem, as quoted in Brian Teare, “Lying Meditation”, and Jennifer Bartlett, “Preface (for Reginald Shepherd)”, in Beauty Is A Verb: The New Poetry of Disability (eds. Jennifer Bartlett, Sheila Black, & Michael Northern); JBR; Levi R Bryant, “What Is Enlightnment”, at Larval Subjects, 28 Oct 011; JBR; Timothy Morton, “Leibniz Love Affair”, at Ecology without Nature, 28 Oct 011; JBR; j/j hastain, long past the presence of common, as quoted in John Pluecker, “It Takes Two, Baby”, at HTMLGIANT, 28 Oct 011; Bhanu Kapil, “Samuel Delaney [sic] Breaks It Down”, at Was Jack Kerouac a Punjabi?, 28 Oct 011; JBR; Deborah J Leslie, “Asterism”, email rec’d 29 Oct 011, approx. 6:18 PST; JBR (K & I just had our cards read, 29 Oct 011, approx. 8 PM PST) by a woman in the lobby of our hotel; she suggested that K’s path is strong and true, and that I really need to regroup. She suggested that I should burn green candles (hence the Ubu reference) and use lavender oil, and that K could use an amber ring; I don’t know how to think about this, but see above re: afib; now, for the first time in those 4 days my heart is calm and still); JBR; Amazon blurb for Elliot Wolfson, A Dream Interpreted within a Dream: Oneiropoiesis and the Prism of Imagination]